(a) (b)

The densities of the transposon statistics of the first replicate the Francisella

species. (a) The density of the insertion statistic. (b) The density of the site

e 2.41 shows the co-distribution between the insertion statistic

ite statistic for the first replicate of the Francisella Tularensis

Their correlation coefficient was 0.891, which was very high.

variation of the correlations shown in Figure 2.41 was obvious.

sposon insertions of a gene could be distributed in either a few

sites or many insertion sites. An obvious outcome is that a model

ed based on the insertion statistic will show different predicted

genes from a model constructed based on the site statistic.

The correlation between the insertion statistic and the site statistic of the first

Francisella Tularensis.

nconsistency is of course not a good thing to deal with. For

Figures 2.42 and 2.43 show the transposon insertion spectra of